At the end of 1953, the Chicago Tribune published an article in which it unveiled architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe's proposal to build a new convention centre in the city of Chicago, a large space free of intermediate structural supports and capable of accommodating 50,000 people. As his student Peter Carter notes in the book Mies van der Rohe at Work, Mies worked on this project both in his office and with a group of master's students at the Illinois Institute of Technology. After the proposal was published, students Yujiro Miwa, Henry Kanazawa and Pao-Chi Chang continued to work on the project, which they delivered as a joint dissertation in June 1954.
Mies brought his experience as an architect into the classroom, first as director of the Bauhaus, and later at the Armour Institute of Technology (later IIT) in Chicago, when he took over the Department of Architecture in 1938. The German accepted the position of director on condition that he could rework the curricula, both undergraduate and graduate, in which his architectural ideals were reflected. Soon the classrooms became a laboratory of ideas in which to test new solutions and reflect on his own concerns.
At the time the thesis was begun, the complete list of master's student projects supervised by Mies does not appear in any bibliographic source, not even in the archives of the school itself. During the research carried out at the Graham Resource Center and the IIT University Archives and Special Collections, 48 master theses deposited between 1939 and 1959 were documented, which deal with functional themes ranging from office buildings, university campuses and museums to large concert, exhibition, and convention halls. The collaborative development between the professor and students of the project for a Convention Hall reveals a close relationship between teaching and practice, a relationship that possibly extends beyond a single project. Moreover, the fact that this proposal is the largest in scale of those developed by Mies hints at the experimental nature of these academic endeavours. Thus, exploring Mies's architecture from the perspective of architectural education offers an alternate way of understanding his legacy.
This research proposes a study of the parallelism between professional practice and teaching in Mies from his American period onwards, based on one of the most outstanding variables of his architecture: structure. To this end, an analysis is proposed, both from a descriptive and graphic point of view, of the relationships between structure and architectural space in the master theses supervised by him in the graduate program, and a comparison will be made with his built work. The projects chosen are the Farnsworth House, Crown Hall and the Neue Nationalgalerie, three structures built by Mies in universal spaces, a typology considered ideal for studying the relationship between structure and architectural space. Once the three works have been chosen, the theses are selected from those that solve the same functional problems: single-family dwelling, school of architecture and art museum. The seven dissertations, submitted by students Jacques Brownson, Charles Worley, Frederick Seidel, Daniel Brenner, Jan Lippert, Peter Carter and Masami Takayama, use a wide range of structural typologies, making it possible to analyse the evolution of the relationship between these and the configuration of space, and cover the twenty-year period during which Mies taught in Chicago. The comparative analysis between dissertations and built work is accompanied by a reflection on his writings, establishing the influence and importance that teaching, thought, and work had on Mies' architecture.