This thesis aims to study the capacity of collective creativity processes to face the challenges of architecture. Given the increasing complexity of the contemporary context, numerous collectives of architects are emerging, proposing new models of production. These models are based on collaborative processes that observe reality in a polyhedral way, and that in the face of problems detected, they develop complex intervention strategies. Processes that imply a paradigm change of the architecture and the role of the contemporary architect, towards a consideration of the project from multiple perspectives.
There are experiences in the history of architecture that have been supported by collaborative processes, which have been compared in this study with current practices. It was observed that, even when developing collaborative activities, there wasn’t real architectural production based on collective creativity. On the other hand, through the study of more than one hundred architectural groups in Spain and Latin America, we have analyzed the influence of the scenarios of complexity generated by the global crisis of 2008. Identifying that in the creation of the collective crisis is not the only triggering factor, but this has had a huge impact on the proliferation of collectives produced in recent years. And finally, the project of El Campo de Cebada has been examined —as a case study paradigmatic of this type of processes of architectural production—in which have participated multiple collectives of architects. Analyzing a series of variables that show the large capacity of the processes of collective creativity to approach the contemporary complexity.
Crisis/complexity contexts have a great influence on the renewal of architectural production processes. Creating, from moments of difficulty, an environment conducive to change through the acceptance of risk. Inventing or discovering new strategies to explore the procedures of architecture that can provide new keys that lead us to what society needs, through the generous service that harmonizes the purpose of Architecture. In this sense, it seems that Collective Creativity —applied to the process of architectural production— has the capacity to successfully face the complexity of the contemporary challenges of Architecture in the field of work that has been studied.